Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Grok 4 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking)

Anthropic

Reasoning: 8
Coding: 5
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 7
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.030
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 40.801tokens/sec

Grok 4

xAI

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.006
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 42.135tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking)` vs `Grok 4`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 debate, Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) scores 80 against Grok 4's 90. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking)300ms

Grok 4300ms

Tokens per Second

Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking)40.801

Grok 442.135

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) would cost $0.034, whereas Grok 4 would cost $0.007. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 Battle for You?

Choose Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Grok 4 if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude 4.1 Opus (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data provided by https://artificialanalysis.ai/