Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison

Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.

The Final Verdict in the Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 Showdown

After a comprehensive analysis, Grok 4 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw intelligence and reasoning. However, Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) remains a highly competitive option, especially for scenarios demanding faster response times and cost-efficiency. This detailed Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 comparison will break down every critical metric to help you make the best decision.

Explore best-for scenarios•Let the AI Selector recommend next steps

Model Snapshot

Key decision metrics at a glance.

Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking)

Anthropic

Reasoning: 7
Coding: 5
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 7
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.006
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 53.534tokens/sec

Grok 4

xAI

Reasoning: 9
Coding: 6
Multimodal: 5
Long Context: 8
Blended Price / 1M tokens: $0.006
P95 Latency: 1000ms
Tokens per second: 42.135tokens/sec

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking)` vs `Grok 4`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 debate, Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) scores 70 against Grok 4's 90. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking)300ms

Grok 4300ms

Tokens per Second

Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking)53.534

Grok 442.135

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4

Power is only one part of the equation. This Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) would cost $0.007, whereas Grok 4 would cost $0.007. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 Battle for You?

Choose Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) if...

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Grok 4 if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Claude 4 Sonnet (Extended Thinking) vs Grok 4 Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Data provided by https://artificialanalysis.ai/